Essay # 2- Literary
Analysis
ENG 102
Instructor- Laura Cline
“Bartleby, the Scrivener”
Herman Melville
Bartleby is a double for the narrator in Melville’s
story, showing the dark ineffectiveness of the lawyer’s sense of Christian
charity, and the absurdity of his work.
The lawyer is an “unambitious” (Paragraph 3) man who has lived his life
in the “easiest way” (Paragraph 3) possible.
His life up until this point had been a “safe” (Paragraph 3) one that
has been all about him. Bartleby would become his charity case; a chance to try
and make up for his dark and selfish life.
The
morning that Bartleby came in to answer the advertisement, the Lawyer described
him as, “pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn!” (Paragraph
15) From the first moment he met
Bartleby he knew that there was something wrong with him and yet he still
decided to hire him. The lawyer also
must have been able to see that there was something not quite right in his own
life and yet he does nothing to try and change it. He is willing to settle for the easy/boring
life.
For
the first few days Bartleby did excellent work.
It wasn’t until he was asked to do more than just copy, that Bartleby
started his mantra, “I would prefer not to.” (Paragraph 21) The fact that the lawyer did not throw
Bartleby out this very instance or at any of the other times Bartleby refused
to do what he said, shows the Lawyers compassion for the sick man. He is trying to do the “Christian” thing even
though he would have never accepted this from his other employees. Just like in his law practice, he is not
ready to argue with Bartleby, it is easier to just ignore the situation and
make a deal with the other employees to do the work.
The
Lawyer says that “there was something about Bartleby that not only strangely
disarmed me, but in a wonderful manner touched and disconcerted me.” (Paragraph
35) He is continually torn between
feelings of anger, frustration, confusion, and pity. And although he knows nothing about
Bartleby’s history he can tell that he “means no mischief; it is plain he
intends no insolence; his aspect sufficiently evinces that his eccentricities
are involuntary.” (Paragraph 53) The
lawyer is offering excuses for Bartleby and for himself. He is putting up with his disobedience
because he thinks he can’t help it; and if Bartleby is crazy, what can he do
about it anyway? Just like the lawyer’s
life. He has always taken the easy road,
why turn a different corner now?
It
was at this point in the story that the lawyer admits that he is helping
Bartleby so that he can feel better about himself. He writes, “Here I can cheaply purchase a
delicious self-approval. To befriend
Bartleby; to humor him in his strange willfulness, will cost me little or
nothing, while I lay up in my soul what will eventually prove a sweet morsel
for my conscience.” (Paragraph 53) He
has spent so much time helping the rich men on Wall-street and very little time
helping anyone else, including himself.
This is his chance to pay some big Karma debt.
Throughout
the rest of the story the Lawyer is surprisingly accepting of Bartleby’s
stubborn attitude. At first he seems to
just not know what to do about it. He is
so surprised by Bartleby’s refusal to do what he asks that he does nothing to
reprimand him. Once he finds out that
Bartleby is living in the office he starts to really pity him. “What miserable
friendlessness and loneliness are here revealed! His poverty is great; but his solitude, how
horrible!” (Paragraph 88) The fact that
Bartleby is so alone really scares the lawyer.
He has a feeling of intense melancholy “for the first time in his life.”
(Paragraph 89) He is a lawyer! How is this even possible? Is he blind?
He has been fortunate enough to live the high life on Wall-street and
somehow missed out on all the suffering in the world, I guess.
When
the lawyer is finally convinced that there is nothing physically wrong with
Bartleby, he decides that “it was his soul that suffered”. (Paragraph 93) I thought it was interesting that this is the
time that he decides to confront Bartleby about the situation and ask him to
leave if he would not provide the answers he desired. He knows the man is not right in the head and
has evidence that Bartleby really needs help and now he wants to argue. And when Bartleby continues to offer no
answers, it is time to kick him out.
The
rest of the story goes on about how to get Bartleby out of the building. When the lawyer cannot figure it out, he
moves out himself! He does offer to help Bartleby in any way he can and even
offers for him to come home and live with him.
But Bartleby is obviously sick and cannot make these decisions
himself. This is where a true Christian
would have acted on Bartleby’s behalf. He
did not have to end up dying alone in jail.
There had to be some kind of institution at that time where he could have
gotten some help. Instead, he took the
easy road, again, and ran away.
Melville, Herman. "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-street." Putnam’s Monthly. A Magazine of Literature, Science, and Art. New York [etc.], G. P. Putnam & Co. [etc.]. Vol. II—November 1853.—No. XI, pp. 546–557; Concluded Vol II.—December 1853.—No. XII, pp. 609–615. bartleby.com. July 1999. 01 Feb 2012 <http://www.bartleby.com/129/>
Melville, Herman. "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-street." Putnam’s Monthly. A Magazine of Literature, Science, and Art. New York [etc.], G. P. Putnam & Co. [etc.]. Vol. II—November 1853.—No. XI, pp. 546–557; Concluded Vol II.—December 1853.—No. XII, pp. 609–615. bartleby.com. July 1999. 01 Feb 2012 <http://www.bartleby.com/129/>
I enjoyed your analysis, Mary. It was well written. The statements about the absurdity of the attorney's life's work are pretty spot on, in my opinion. The difference between the unambitious lawyer and the shiftless scrivener are one of degree, and both lifestyles leave much to be desired.
ReplyDeleteMarie,
ReplyDeleteWell done job on writing your literary analysis. I thought you had some great quotes to back up your statements. I agree with you when you said that the attorney wanted to pay back to others rather than the same rich Wall-Street people. The few pointers I can give you are; in the beginning where you said Bartleby is a double for the narrator. The attorney is actually a double for the narrator. Also, go back and look over your introductory and conclusion paragraphs to see if there are some things you could add to make it a stronger. I've always found reading aloud to myself in a quiet room helps find any errors throughout the paper. One other thing I would do is add a little bit more of your own opinions and thoughts in each paragraph rather than it mostly consisting of quotes. Anyways, I enjoyed reading your essay, and liked your perspective. Good job.